Stressed Neighbourhood Relations of India
“Obstacle in Economic Growth”

Author : CA A. K. Jain


-Chapter Headings-

* Preamble
* Traditional Challenges from Bordering Countries

1. Historical Baggage :
2. Geopolitical Tensions :
3. Trade Barriers and Tariffs :
4. Infrastructural Challenges :
5. Security Concerns :

* Solutions to Foster Economic Development
1. Diplomatic Engagement and Conflict Resolution :
2. Trade Liberalization and Regional Integration :
3. Infrastructure Development :
4. Confidence-Building Measures :
5. Economic Diversification and Innovation :

* Government Initiatives
1. Neighbourhood First Policy :

A. Key Initiatives

B. Implementation Challenges

C. Quantum Information
2. Connectivity Initiatives :

A. Key Connectivity Initiatives :

B. Success and Deficiencies
3. SAFTA and FTA Trade Agreements :

A. Implementation of SAFTA and FTA Agreements

B. Deficiencies in SAFTA and FTA Agreements

C. Suggestions for Improvement

4. Look East Policy :
A. Objectives of the Look East Policy :
B. Implementation of the Look East Policy :
C. Key Initiatives under the Look East Policy :
D. Successes of the Look East Policy :
E. Deficiencies in the Look East Policy:
F. Suggestions for Improvement :

5. Development Assistance :
A. Deficiencies in Development Assistance Policy :
B. Suggestions for Improvement :

6. Bay of Bengal Initiative for Economic Cooperation :
A. Implementation :
B. Deficiencies in Implementation :
C. Suggestions for Improvement
a. Strengthening the Institutional Framework :
b. Fast-Track the FTA Negotiations :
c. Enhance Connectivity Initiatives :
d. Improve Coordination with Other Regional Organizations :
e. Focus on People-to-People Connectivity :

* Recent Developments
* Neighbourhood Analysis
a. Pakistan
b. Myanmar
c. China
d. Bangladesh
e. Sri Lanka
f. Maldives
g. Afghanistan

Challenges and the Road Ahead
Conclusion

Preamble

India, as a diverse and burgeoning economy, stands at a crucial juncture in its development trajectory. While internal challenges are being addressed with vivacity, the dynamics of its relationships with neighbouring countries also play a significant role in shaping its economic progress.

In this chapter, we delve into the complexities of India's neighbourly relations, exploring the obstacles they pose to its economic growth and offering potential solutions.


Traditional Challenges from Bordering Countries

1. Historical Baggage : Historical disputes and unresolved conflicts cast a shadow over India's relations with certain neighbours. Issues like border disputes with China and Pakistan, stemming from historical disagreements, periodically strain diplomatic ties and hinder economic cooperation.

2. Geopolitical Tensions : Geopolitical rivalries and strategic interests often overshadow economic cooperation in the region. India's strained relations with Pakistan and China, exacerbated by geopolitical manoeuvres, impede the establishment of robust economic partnerships and hinder regional integration efforts.

3. Trade Barriers and Tariffs : Trade barriers, including high tariffs and non-tariff barriers, impede the smooth flow of goods and services across borders. Disputes over trade policies and market access further exacerbate tensions, hindering the expansion of trade volumes and economic cooperation.

4. Infrastructural Challenges : Inadequate infrastructure and connectivity hinder cross-border trade and investment. Poor transportation networks, border disputes, and bureaucratic hurdles increase transaction costs and delay the movement of goods, stifling economic growth potential.

5. Security Concerns : Persistent security threats, such as cross-border terrorism and insurgencies, undermine trust and confidence between India and its neighbours. Heightened security concerns necessitate significant resource allocation towards defence spending, diverting funds away from productive economic endeavours.

Solutions to Foster Economic Development

1. Diplomatic Engagement and Conflict Resolution : India must prioritize diplomatic engagement and conflict resolution mechanisms to address historical grievances and territorial disputes. By fostering dialogue and mutual understanding, India can create an environment conducive to economic cooperation and regional stability.

2. Trade Liberalization and Regional Integration : Promoting trade liberalization initiatives and regional economic integration can unlock new growth opportunities for India and its neighbours. By reducing tariffs, harmonizing trade policies, and enhancing connectivity infrastructure, India can facilitate smoother trade flows and foster economic interdependence.

3. Infrastructure Development : Investing in cross-border infrastructure projects and enhancing connectivity networks can catalyse economic development in the region. Joint infrastructure development initiatives, such as the International North-South Transport Corridor, can facilitate trade facilitation and promote regional integration.

4. Confidence-Building Measures : Implementing confidence-building measures, including trust-building initiatives and people-to-people exchanges, can mitigate security concerns and foster mutual trust between India and its neighbours. Building bridges at the grassroots level can pave the way for stronger diplomatic ties and enhanced economic cooperation.

5. Economic Diversification and Innovation : Diversifying India's economy and promoting innovation can reduce its dependence on volatile neighbourly relations. By investing in sectors such as technology, renewable energy, and healthcare, India can foster sustainable economic growth and insulate itself from external geopolitical shocks.

Government Initiatives

The Government of India has undertaken various efforts to improve neighbourly international relations to enhance business prospects for Indians and foster overall economic development. Here are some key initiatives:

1. Neighbourhood First Policy : The Neighbourhood First Policy is a strategic initiative by the Government of India aimed at prioritizing and strengthening relations with its neighbouring countries. The policy focuses on fostering strong political, economic, and cultural ties, with a particular emphasis on enhancing cross-border trade and connectivity. The initiative is part of India's broader foreign policy strategy to maintain stability and cooperation in the South Asian region, ensuring that economic growth and development are mutually beneficial.

The Neighbourhood First Policy has been implemented through various bilateral and multilateral agreements, trade pacts, and infrastructure projects aimed at improving connectivity and trade with neighbouring countries such as Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, and others.

A. Key Initiatives :
a. Bilateral Trade Agreements: India has signed several bilateral trade agreements with neighbouring countries to reduce tariffs, simplify customs procedures, and promote trade.

b. Infrastructure Projects : Development of roads, railways, and ports to enhance connectivity. Notable projects include the India-Bangladesh Friendship Pipeline, the Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Transport Project (connecting India with Myanmar), and the BBIN (Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal) Motor Vehicles Agreement.

c. Energy Cooperation : Initiatives such as the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) Framework Agreement for Energy Cooperation and the India-Nepal Power Trade Agreement.

d. Digital Connectivity : Agreements to enhance digital connectivity, such as the India-Sri Lanka Submarine Cable System.

B. Implementation Challenges in Neighbourhood Business Policy : Despite several initiatives under the Neighbourhood First Policy, there are certain deficiencies in its implementation:

a. Inconsistent Policy Implementation : BBIN Motor Vehicles Agreement has faced delays due to lack of consensus among member countries, particularly Bhutan, which has expressed environmental concerns.

b. Infrastructure Gaps : While India has invested in infrastructure projects, delays in project execution, such as the Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Transport Project, have hindered the full potential of cross-border trade. The Kaladan Multimodal project connects Kolkata port with Myanmar's Sittwe Port by sea, Sittwe to Paletwa via river Kaladan, Paletwa to the border of India, and Myanmar via road and further ahead to Lawngtlai, Mizoram by road.

c. Trade Imbalances : India’s trade with Nepal, Bangladesh and Bhutan is heavily skewed, with India exporting significantly more than it imports, leading to concerns about sustainability and mutual benefits.

d. Security Concerns : Persistent border disputes, such as those with Pakistan and China, have negatively impacted trade and diplomatic relations, limiting the policy’s effectiveness.

e. Non-Tariff Barriers : Non-tariff barriers, such as complex customs procedures and regulatory standards, continue to hamper trade with countries like Bangladesh and Nepal.

f. Political Instability : Political instability in neighbouring countries, such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Maldives has disrupted trade routes and posed challenges to the policy’s objectives.

C. Quantum Information on the Success of the Neighbourhood First Policy : The following table provides quantitative data on the success of the Neighbourhood First Policy initiative:

Success of the Neighborhood First Policy initiative
Parameter 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
India-Bangladesh Trade ($ Billion) 6.9 7.5 9 10.2 11.5 13
India-Nepal Trade ($ Billion) 3.2 4 5 5.6 6.1 6.8
India-Bhutan Trade ($ Million) 484 505 548 615 675 725
India-Myanmar Trade ($ Billion) 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.8 3.1 3.5
Number of Bilateral Agreements 15 18 20 22 24 26
Infrastructure Projects Completed 5 8 10 12 15 18

The Neighbourhood First Policy has made significant strides in improving cross-border trade and relations with neighbouring countries. However, to fully realize its potential, the Government of India must address the existing deficiencies and implement the suggested improvements. With consistent efforts and regional cooperation, the policy can become a cornerstone of India's foreign policy, promoting economic growth and regional stability.

2. Connectivity Initiatives : The Government of India has undertaken several connectivity initiatives aimed at improving cross-border trade with neighbouring countries. These initiatives focus on enhancing physical, digital, and institutional connectivity. The primary goal is to facilitate smoother trade flows, reduce logistics costs, and strengthen regional economic integration.

A. Key Connectivity Initiatives :
a. BBIN Motor Vehicles Agreement (MVA) : The agreement between Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, and Nepal (BBIN) aims to facilitate the seamless movement of cargo and passenger vehicles across borders. This was signed in 2015, the agreement is partially implemented, with Bhutan opting out temporarily. The trial runs for cargo vehicles have shown promise, but full-scale implementation remains pending.

b. India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway : This project aims to connect India with Southeast Asia through Myanmar and Thailand, promoting trade and cultural exchanges. The 1,360 km highway project has seen progress, but delays in Myanmar have slowed the project. India has been actively engaged in upgrading its portion of the highway.

c. Kaladan Multimodal Transit Transport Project : This project aims to connect India's north-eastern states with the port of Sittwe in Myanmar, providing an alternative route for goods. The project involves road, river, and sea transport components. While the Sittwe port is operational, other components, particularly the road connectivity, are still under development.

d. Chabahar Port Development : The development of Chabahar Port in Iran aims to provide India with a strategic alternative to access Afghanistan and Central Asia, bypassing Pakistan. This is operational since 2017, the port has facilitated trade with Afghanistan, although geopolitical challenges have affected its full utilization.

e. Integrated Check Posts (ICPs) : Establishing ICPs at major border points to streamline customs procedures and enhance trade. ICPs have been established at various borders, including with Bangladesh (Petrapole), Nepal (Raxaul), and Pakistan (Attari). These have improved the efficiency of cross-border trade but face challenges like congestion and infrastructure bottlenecks.

B. Success and Deficiencies : While these initiatives have been crucial in boosting connectivity, several challenges and deficiencies remain. Many projects have been delayed due to bureaucratic hurdles, lack of co-ordination with neighbouring countries and infrastructure issues. The India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway faces delays due to political instability in Myanmar. India's connectivity projects, particularly with countries like Pakistan and China, face geopolitical hurdles that limit their effectiveness. The Chabahar Port faces challenges due to sanctions on Iran and regional tensions.

Despite progress, there are still significant gaps in infrastructure, particularly in India's north-eastern region, which hinder seamless connectivity. The Kaladan project is yet to be fully operational due to incomplete road infrastructure in Myanmar. While India has been proactive, a lack of reciprocation or slow implementation by neighbouring countries has hampered the full realization of these initiatives. Bhutan's temporary withdrawal from the BBIN MVA has slowed down the initiative.

Quantum Information on the Success of Connectivity Initiatives
Initiative Year of Commencement Status Challenges Success Metrics
BBIN Motor Vehicles Agreement 2015 Partially Implemented Lack of Bhutan's participation Successful trial runs of cargo vehicles
India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Hwy 2002 Ongoing Political instability in Myanmar 70% of highway construction completed
Kaladan Multimodal Transit Transport 2008 Partially Operational Infrastructure gaps in Myanmar Sittwe port operational; road development ongoing
Chabahar Port Development 2003 Operational Geopolitical tensions Facilitated trade with Afghanistan; reduced dependence on Pakistan
Integrated Check Posts (ICPs) 2012 Operational at major borders Congestion, infrastructure bottlenecks Increased trade efficiency; reduced clearance times

The Connectivity Initiatives of the Government of India have made significant strides in improving cross-border trade with neighbouring countries. However, challenges like delayed implementation, geopolitical tensions, and infrastructure gaps continue to hinder their full potential. By addressing these deficiencies and implementing the suggested improvements, India can further strengthen its regional trade and economic integration.

3. SAFTA and FTA Trade Agreements : SAFTA (South Asian Free Trade Area): SAFTA was established in 2004 with the goal of promoting and enhancing trade and economic cooperation among the member countries of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC). The member countries include India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, the Maldives, and Afghanistan. The agreement aims to reduce tariffs, eliminate trade barriers, and facilitate the free flow of goods among the member nations.

FTA (Free Trade Agreements): India has signed multiple bilateral and multilateral Free Trade Agreements with neighbouring countries to enhance trade and economic cooperation. These agreements focus on reducing tariffs, eliminating non-tariff barriers, and promoting investment and technology exchange. Notable FTAs with neighbouring countries include the India-Sri Lanka FTA, India-Nepal Trade Treaty, and the India-Bhutan Trade Agreement.

A. Implementation of SAFTA and FTA Agreements : The implementation of SAFTA has led to a reduction in tariffs on various goods traded among SAARC countries. India has played a significant role in driving this initiative by offering tariff concessions to its neighbours. However, non-tariff barriers, political tensions, and infrastructural challenges have hindered the full realization of SAFTA’s potential. For instance, India-Pakistan trade under SAFTA has been severely restricted due to political disputes.

India's bilateral FTAs with neighbouring countries have seen mixed results. The India-Sri Lanka FTA, for instance, has led to an increase in trade between the two countries. However, concerns about trade imbalances and the limited scope of the agreements have been raised. The India-Nepal Trade Treaty has facilitated cross-border trade by allowing duty-free access to each other's markets. However, issues like trade restrictions and infrastructural bottlenecks have limited its effectiveness.

B. Deficiencies in SAFTA and FTA Agreements : Despite tariff reductions, non-tariff barriers such as stringent customs procedures, technical standards, and licensing requirements have restricted trade under SAFTA and FTAs. Indian exporters often face difficulties in accessing the Pakistani market due to cumbersome certification processes. Geopolitical tensions between India and some neighbouring countries have also adversely affected the implementation of trade agreements. The India-Pakistan trade relationship remains strained, affecting trade flows under SAFTA.

Poor infrastructure at border points, including inadequate road and rail connectivity, has limited the potential benefits of trade agreements.The India-Nepal border has witnessed frequent trade disruptions due to poor road conditions and logistical delays.

C. Suggestions for Improvement : Investment in improving road, rail, and port infrastructure at border points will facilitate smoother trade flows. Developing dedicated freight corridors along the India-Nepal and India-Bhutan borders will reduce transit time. Harmonizing technical standards, simplifying customs procedures, and improving transparency will reduce non-tariff barriers. Expanding the scope of existing FTAs to include services, investment, and technology transfer, will deepen economic integration. Continuous dialogue with neighbouring countries will resolve political issues that impact trade relations.

SAFTA and FTA Agreements
Agreement Partner Countries Year of Signing Key Features Success Metrics (Quantum Information)
SAFTA SAARC Members 2004 Tariff reduction, trade facilitation Mixed success due to political tensions, non-tariff barriers, and limited intra-SAARC trade
India-Sri Lanka FTA Sri Lanka 1998 Tariff concessions on goods, limited scope in services Increase in bilateral trade; concerns over trade imbalance
India-Nepal Trade Treaty Nepal 1950, 2009 (Revised) Duty-free access, focus on goods trade Facilitated trade, but infrastructural issues and restrictions remain
India-Bhutan Trade Agreement Bhutan 1972, 2016 (Revised) Free trade, emphasis on hydropower cooperation Significant trade growth, but limited diversification

While SAFTA and FTAs have played a crucial role in enhancing cross-border trade between India and its neighbours, their full potential has not been realized due to various challenges. Addressing these issues through infrastructure development, reducing non-tariff barriers, expanding the scope of agreements, and enhancing diplomatic engagement can lead to more robust and balanced trade relations in the region.

4. Look East Policy : The Look East Policy was initiated by the Government of India in 1991 under the leadership of Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao. The policy was aimed at enhancing economic and strategic relations with the nations of Southeast Asia to counterbalance China's influence in the region and to foster economic growth through closer ties with these rapidly growing economies.

A. Objectives of the Look East Policy : To Strengthen Indian trade and investment ties with Southeast Asian nations and enhancing defence and strategic relations with key partners in the region. Also promoting cultural exchanges and enhancing connectivity through infrastructure development.

B. Implementation of the Look East Policy : The Look East Policy has been implemented in three main phases:
a. First Phase (1991-2001) : Focused on economic diplomacy and trade relations with ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) countries.
b. Second Phase (2002-2014) : Expanded the scope to include strategic, security, and political dimensions, including partnerships in defence and security.
c. Third Phase (2014 onwards) : Rebranded as the Act East Policy, this phase emphasizes action-oriented and result-driven policies, expanding engagement to East Asia and beyond.

C. Key Initiatives under the Look East Policy : India signed several FTAs with ASEAN countries to boost trade.

Development of infrastructure such as the India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway and the Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Transport Project are part of this policy. India also enhanced defence cooperation with countries like Vietnam, Singapore, and Indonesia.

D. Successes of the Look East Policy : India's trade with ASEAN increased from around $7 billion in 2000 to over $80 billion by 2020. India has signed multiple defence agreements and conducted joint military exercises with Southeast Asian countries. Initiatives like the Mekong-Ganga Cooperation fostered cultural exchanges and educational partnerships.

E. Deficiencies in the Look East Policy : Despite its successes, the look East Policy has faced several challenges.

Projects like the India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway have faced delays due to bureaucratic hurdles, lack of coordination, and difficult terrain. The policy primarily focused on ASEAN countries, with limited engagement with other East Asian nations like Japan and South Korea in the initial phases. There has been a lack of a clear strategic framework, leading to inconsistent policies and missed opportunities in defence cooperation.

F. Suggestions for Improvement : To enhance the effectiveness of the Look East Policy, several improvements can be made. Streamlining the approval process and ensuring timely completion of infrastructure projects like the Trilateral Highway and the Kaladan Project can boost trade and people-to-people connectivity. Originally proposed in the early 2000s, the India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway project has faced delays due to funding issues and logistical challenges. Expediting this project could significantly enhance trade and connectivity between India and Southeast Asia. India-Vietnam Strategic Partnership, despite signing multiple defence agreements, India's engagement with Vietnam has been cautious, partly due to concerns over China's reaction. A more assertive approach on following lines could strengthen India's position in the South China Sea region.

a. Diversify Trade : Encouraging Indian businesses to explore new markets within ASEAN and East Asia, and reducing dependency on specific sectors, can help address the trade deficit.

b. Strengthen Strategic Partnerships : Developing a clear and consistent strategic framework, with a focus on maritime security and defense cooperation, can enhance India's influence in the region.

c. Expand Engagement Beyond ASEAN : Actively engaging with countries like Japan, South Korea, and Australia in the Indo-Pacific region can provide new opportunities for economic and strategic cooperation.

d. Enhance People-to-People Connectivity : Increasing cultural exchanges, educational collaborations, and tourism can deepen ties at the grassroots level.

Success of the Look East Policy

Year India-ASEAN Trade ($ Billion) Key Strategic Partnerships Established Major Connectivity Projects Initiated Cultural Exchange Initiatives
2000 7 None India-Myanmar Road Mekong-Ganga Cooperation
2010 42 Vietnam (Defense Cooperation) Trilateral Highway Nalanda University Initiative
2020 80 Indonesia, Singapore (Maritime Security) Kaladan Multi-Modal Project ASEAN-India Summit
2023 98 Japan (Strategic Partnership) Expansion of Trilateral Highway Act East Forum

The Look East Policy has been a significant strategic initiative by India to engage with Southeast Asia and East Asia. While it has achieved considerable success, especially in trade and strategic partnerships, there are areas where improvements can be made. Addressing the deficiencies through accelerated infrastructure development, diversified trade, and expanded strategic engagement will be crucial for the future success of the policy.

5. Development Assistance : India's development assistance to neighbouring countries is a key element of its foreign policy, driven by the "Neighbourhood First" initiative. The Indian government provides assistance in various forms, including grants, concessional loans, technical expertise, and capacity-building programs. These initiatives foster socio-economic development in neighbouring countries, enhance bilateral relations, and also promote bilateral trade.

India provides financial assistance through grants and concessional loans for infrastructure projects, education, healthcare, and capacity building in neighbouring countries. India offers humanitarian assistance in the wake of natural disasters, such as earthquakes and floods, providing relief materials, medical aid, and rehabilitation support. Major infrastructure projects like road connectivity, power plants, and railways have been initiated in countries like Nepal, Bhutan, and Bangladesh to promote economic development.

A. Deficiencies in Development Assistance Policy : There is often insufficient coordination between Indian agencies, recipient governments, and local stakeholders, leading to project delays and cost overruns. The absence of robust monitoring mechanisms has led to delays and inefficiencies in project execution. Development assistance projects sometimes fail to adequately engage with local communities, leading to a lack of ownership and sustainability. Excessive focus on certain countries or projects has occasionally led to political and economic dependencies, creating imbalances in regional development. Complex bureaucratic procedures on both sides often result in project delays and cost overruns.

B. Suggestions for Improvement : Establish dedicated coordination units within Indian missions in neighbouring countries to ensure better alignment of goals and resources.

Implement a robust monitoring and evaluation framework with clear performance indicators, ensuring accountability and timely completion of projects. Involve local communities in the planning and execution of development projects to ensure that their needs are met and that projects are sustainable. Spread development assistance more evenly across sectors and regions to avoid over-reliance on certain projects or countries.

Focus on building the capacity of local institutions to manage and maintain projects post-completion, ensuring long-term sustainability. Simplify bureaucratic procedures to expedite project approval and implementation.

India's development assistance to neighboring countries has yielded significant benefits but is not without its challenges. By addressing the deficiencies and implementing the suggested improvements, India can enhance the effectiveness of its assistance, fostering stronger regional ties and promoting sustainable development across South Asia.

Financial Assistance by Government of India to Neighboring Countries
Country Project Year Type Commitment (USD million) Status Sector
Nepal Hydro Project 2018 Loan 1,200 Ongoing Energy
Terai Road Project 2008 Grant 350 Completed Infrastructure
Check Posts (ICP) 2010 Grant 150 Completed Infrastructure
Bhutan Hydroelectric Project 2010 Grant 500 Completed Energy
Bhutan-India Road 2004 Grant 150 Completed Infrastructure
Bangladesh Akhaura-Rail Link 2013 Grant 120 Ongoing Transport
Bangladesh Pipeline 2018 Grant 450 Ongoing Energy
Infrastructure Dev. 2011 Loan 2,000 Ongoing Infrastructure
Sri Lanka Northern Railway 2010 Loan 800 Completed Infrastructure
Jaffna Cultural Centre 2015 Grant 50 Completed Cultural Exchange
Indian Housing Project 2010 Grant 270 Ongoing Housing
Maldives Greater Male Connectivity Project 2020 Grant and Concessional Loan 500 Ongoing Infrastructure
Cricket Stadium in Hulhumale 2019 Grant 40 Completed Sports Infrastructure
Afghanistan Salma Dam Project 2006 Grant 290 Completed (2016) Energy and Irrigation
Afghan Parliament Building 2007 Grant 90 Completed (2015) Governance
Myanmar Kaladan Multimodal Transport Project 2010 Grant and Concessional Loan 484 Ongoing Connectivity
Rhi-Tiddim Road Project 2017 Gran 50 Ongoing Infrastructure

6. Bay of Bengal Initiative for Economic Cooperation : The Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) is a regional organization established in 1997 to promote economic cooperation and regional integration among countries surrounding the Bay of Bengal. The member countries include Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Thailand. BIMSTEC serves as a bridge between South and Southeast Asia, focusing on sectors such as trade, technology, energy, transport, tourism, fisheries, and agriculture.

A. Implementation : India has been an active member of BIMSTEC since its inception and plays a crucial role in its functioning. The Indian government has implemented several initiatives under the BIMSTEC framework, such as:
a. BIMSTEC Energy Grid Interconnection : Aimed at improving energy cooperation and grid connectivity among member countries.
b. BIMSTEC Free Trade Agreement (FTA) : Efforts to establish a free trade area among member nations to boost intra-regional trade.
c. BIMSTEC Transport Connectivity : Projects like the Kaladan Multimodal Transit Transport Project to enhance connectivity among BIMSTEC nations. However, the overall implementation has faced challenges due to various factors.

B. Deficiencies in Implementation :
a. Slow Progress on FTA : The BIMSTEC Free Trade Agreement, which was supposed to enhance trade among member nations, has faced delays and has not yet been fully implemented. Negotiations have been ongoing for years without a final agreement.
b. Lack of Infrastructure Development : Connectivity projects such as road, rail, and port infrastructure are still in nascent stages. For instance, the Kaladan Multimodal Project has faced delays due to logistical and security issues.
c. Limited Institutional Framework : BIMSTEC lacks a strong institutional framework, making it difficult to coordinate and implement initiatives effectively. The absence of a permanent secretariat and insufficient funding contribute to these issues.
d. Political Instability : Political changes and conflicts in member countries have impeded cooperation. For example, the Rohingya crisis has strained relations between Myanmar and other member states.
e. Duplication of Efforts : There is an overlap between BIMSTEC and other regional organizations like SAARC, leading to duplication of efforts and resources.

C. Suggestions for Improvement :
a. Strengthening the Institutional Framework : Establish a permanent secretariat with adequate resources and authority to coordinate activities, monitor progress, and implement decisions effectively.
b. Fast-Track the FTA Negotiations : Expedite the finalization and implementation of the BIMSTEC Free Trade Agreement to enhance trade and economic cooperation among member countries.
c. Enhance Connectivity Initiatives : Prioritize and fast-track infrastructure projects like the Kaladan Multimodal Transit Transport Project and the Asian Trilateral Highway. Example: Increase collaboration with private sector investors to ensure timely completion.
d. Improve Coordination with Other Regional Organizations : Reduce overlap with SAARC and other regional initiatives by clearly defining BIMSTEC’s niche and focus areas.
e. Focus on People-to-People Connectivity : Enhance cultural and educational exchanges to build trust and mutual understanding among member countries. Example: Initiate BIMSTEC Youth Programs and scholarships to promote regional cooperation.
 

Implementation Status and Deficiencies
Area Status Deficiencies
BIMSTEC Free Trade Agreement In negotiation since 2004 Slow progress, lack of consensus among member states
Energy Cooperation Ongoing Insufficient grid connectivity, lack of energy-sharing mechanisms
Transport Connectivity Partially implemented Delays in infrastructure projects like Kaladan Multimodal Project
Institutional Framework Weak No permanent secretariat, limited funding
Political Cooperation Mixed Political instability, conflicts like Rohingya crisis impacting cooperation

 

Success of BIMSTEC Initiative by the Government of India
Year Initiative/Project Progress (%) Challenges/Remarks
2004 BIMSTEC Free Trade Agreement Negotiations 60% Stalled negotiations, lack of consensus
2008 Kaladan Multimodal Transit Transport Project 40% Delayed due to logistical and security issues
2014 BIMSTEC Energy Grid Interconnection 50% Slow implementation, funding constraints
2018 BIMSTEC Permanent Secretariat Establishment 30% Lack of resources, political will
2022 BIMSTEC Transport Connectivity Projects 55% Incomplete due to funding and coordination issues

The BIMSTEC initiative holds significant potential for enhancing regional cooperation and economic growth in the Bay of Bengal region. However, the slow implementation, weak institutional framework, and political challenges have hindered its success. By addressing these deficiencies and adopting the suggested improvements, BIMSTEC can become a more effective platform for regional integration.

Recent Developments

Despite occasional challenges, India has made efforts to resolve disputes and improve relations with neighbours. For example, Border agreements with Bangladesh and Bhutan have helped in resolving longstanding border disputes.Diplomatic engagements with Pakistan, though intermittent, aim to address issues and foster stability in the region.

While these efforts demonstrate India's commitment to fostering good relations with its neighbours for economic development, challenges such as geopolitical tensions, border disputes, and internal conflicts continue to pose obstacles. However, sustained diplomatic efforts and engagement remain key to realizing the full potential of economic cooperation in the region.

Neighbourhood Analysis

Pakistan
Despite strained political relations, India imports fruits, cement, mineral oils, and spices from Pakistan. However, the trade between India and Pakistan is limited compared to their potential due to various geopolitical reasons. Despite the political tensions, India exports some goods to Pakistan including cotton, machinery and equipment, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and agricultural products.

India and Pakistan have historically had tense relations, leading to frequent border skirmishes and disruptions in trade. According to the World Bank, bilateral trade between India and Pakistan stood at only $2.4 billion in 2019, significantly lower than the potential due to political tensions. Projects such as the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline or the Central Asia-South Asia Electricity Transmission and Trade Project (CASA-1000) could significantly benefit the region's energy security and economic development.

The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) estimated that India spent around $71.1 billion on defence in 2020, making it the third-largest spender globally. These expenditures could otherwise be diverted towards socio-economic development programs, infrastructure, and education if there were less hostility with Pakistan.

Political tensions negatively impact tourism and cultural exchange between the two countries which could otherwise foster greater understanding, cooperation, and economic ties between India and Pakistan.

Beyond direct economic impacts, strained relations impose opportunity costs on both countries. Opportunities for joint ventures, cross-border collaborations, and shared infrastructure projects are lost due to political mistrust. This not only affects bilateral trade but also limits the potential for economic growth and regional stability.

In conclusion, the strained political relations between India and Pakistan have multifaceted negative implications for economic growth, regional stability, and development efforts. Efforts towards conflict resolution, confidence-building measures, and diplomatic dialogue are crucial to unlock the economic potential of the region and foster greater prosperity for India.

Myanmar
The strained political relations between India and Myanmar indeed have significant implications for economic growth in both countries.

According to data from the Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Government of India, bilateral trade between India and Myanmar amounted to $2.18 billion in 2020-21. Any strain in relations could disrupt this trade flow, affecting the economies of both countries.

India has significant investments in Myanmar, particularly in sectors such as infrastructure, energy, and manufacturing. For example, Indian companies have invested in projects such as the Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Transport Project, which aims to connect the eastern Indian seaport of Kolkata with Sittwe port in Myanmar. Any deterioration in political relations could jeopardize such investments, impacting economic growth prospects for both nations.

Projects such as the India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway and the Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Transport Project are vital for boosting trade and economic integration in the region.

India imports natural gas from Myanmar, and there are plans for further collaboration in this area. Any disruption in political relations could affect energy cooperation agreements, leading to uncertainty in the energy supply chain and potentially impacting economic growth in both countries.

Political tensions may also exacerbate humanitarian concerns, such as the plight of Rohingya refugees. The Rohingya crisis has strained relations between India and Myanmar, with India expressing concerns about the human rights situation in Rakhine State.

Any escalation of tensions related to humanitarian issues can further strain bilateral ties and impede efforts towards economic cooperation.

China
India and China are major trading partners. Any deterioration in political relations can lead to trade barriers, tariffs, or even trade embargoes. This can severely impact India's exports to China and its access to the Chinese market, affecting various industries such as electronics, pharmaceuticals, and textiles. According to data from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, India's trade deficit with China stood at around $45 billion in the fiscal year 2020-21.

India imports a wide range of products from China, including electronic goods, machinery, organic chemicals, plastics, and fertilizers. Consumer goods like toys, mobile phones, and electronic appliances are also significant imports. India primarily exports raw materials such as iron ore, cotton, organic chemicals, and gems and jewelry to China. There are also exports of machinery, electronics, and pharmaceuticals.

Chinese investments in India have been significant in recent years, particularly in sectors such as technology, infrastructure, and start-ups. However, strained political relations may lead to a decrease in Chinese investments or even divestment from existing projects.

Many Indian industries rely on Chinese imports for raw materials, components, and machinery. Disruptions in the supply chain due to strained political relations can lead to delays in production and increased costs for Indian manufacturers. For example, in the pharmaceutical industry, India imports active pharmaceutical ingredients and intermediates from China for the production of drugs. Any disruption in the supply of these key components can adversely affect the pharmaceutical sector, which is a crucial contributor to India's economy.

In conclusion, strained political relations with China can have multifaceted negative impacts on India's economic growth, ranging from trade disruptions and supply chain issues to decreased investment and market uncertainties.

Bangladesh
Bangladesh is one of India's significant trading partners. Any disruption in political relations could lead to trade barriers such as tariffs, quotas, or even trade embargoes. According to data from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India, bilateral trade between India and Bangladesh has been steadily growing over the years, reaching approximately $10 billion in 2021. Any hindrance in this trade relationship could negatively impact both economies.

India imports garments, textiles, leather, fish, and agricultural products from Bangladesh. Additionally, electrical machinery and equipment are also imported. India exports cotton, machinery and equipment, iron and steel, chemicals, vehicles, pharmaceuticals, electronics, and agricultural products to Bangladesh.

India and Bangladesh have been collaborating on various infrastructure projects aimed at improving connectivity between the two countries. For instance, the construction of bridges, roads, and railways facilitates trade and enhances economic integration. However, strained political relations could impede the progress of such projects.

Energy cooperation is vital for ensuring energy security and meeting growing energy demands. India and Bangladesh have engaged in energy cooperation through projects such as the construction of power plants and the establishment of energy corridors. However, political tensions could disrupt such cooperation.

Tensions between the two countries could have broader implications for regional dynamics, affecting initiatives such as SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) and BIMSTEC (Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation). This could hinder efforts towards regional integration, trade facilitation, and collective economic growth.

Fostering a positive and constructive relationship with Bangladesh is crucial for realizing the full economic potential of both countries and promoting prosperity in the region.

Sri Lanka
India is one of Sri Lanka's largest trading partners, with bilateral trade reaching billions of dollars annually. According to data from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India, bilateral trade between India and Sri Lanka stood at $4.93 billion in 2020-21, with India's exports to Sri Lanka amounting to $4.12 billion and imports from Sri Lanka at $814.3 million. Any disruption in trade relations would significantly impact these figures.

India imports tea, rubber, coconut, and spices from Sri Lanka. Textiles, precious stones, and electronic equipment are also among the imports.India exports petroleum products, machinery and equipment, iron and steel, chemicals, vehicles, pharmaceuticals, textiles, and agricultural products to Sri Lanka.

Indian companies also have made significant investments in Sri Lanka across various sectors such as infrastructure, real estate, hospitality, and manufacturing. Political tensions could deter further investments, leading to a slowdown in economic growth for both nations.

Sri Lanka is a popular tourist destination for Lanka travellers. Political tensions can lead to travel advisories and restrictions, reducing tourist inflows and causing revenue losses. Political tensions may also lead to increased militarization or diplomatic standoffs, creating an atmosphere of uncertainty that can deter foreign investors and harm economic growth across the region.

It's imperative for both countries to prioritize diplomatic dialogue and cooperation to mitigate such risks and foster mutually beneficial economic ties.

Maldives
Maldives is an important trading partner for India, particularly in sectors such as tourism, fisheries, and infrastructure. Any political tensions could lead to disruptions in trade flows, affecting businesses on both sides. For example, delays in customs clearance or increased tariffs could hamper the smooth flow of goods between the two countries.

Being a small island nation, Maldives mainly exports fish and fish products to India. Additionally, India imports scrap metal, machinery, and textiles from the Maldives. India primarily exports food products, machinery and equipment, pharmaceuticals, vehicles, textiles, and electronics to the Maldives.

India has been involved in various infrastructure projects in the Maldives, including the construction of ports, airports, and other critical infrastructure. Strained political relations could jeopardize existing projects and deter future investment from Indian companies. This could result in economic losses for India and hinder the Maldives' development plans.

India and the Maldives have a history of security cooperation, particularly in areas such as maritime security and counter-terrorism. Deterioration in political relations could undermine this cooperation, potentially allowing security threats to proliferate in the region. This instability could deter foreign investment in both countries and negatively impact economic growth.

The Maldives occupies a strategic location in the Indian Ocean region, and its political stability is crucial for India's broader geopolitical interests. Strained relations with the Maldives could diminish India's influence in the region, allowing other external actors to gain a foothold. This could have long-term implications for India's economic and strategic interests in the Indian Ocean.

In conclusion, strained political relations with the Maldives can have far-reaching consequences for India's economy, ranging from disruptions in trade and investment to jeopardizing regional stability and security cooperation. It is in the interest of both countries to maintain positive diplomatic ties and resolve any disputes through dialogue and constructive engagement.

Afghanistan
India has historically been one of Afghanistan's largest trade partners, particularly in terms of imports. Any deterioration in political relations could disrupt bilateral trade and investment flows.

According to data from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, India's exports to Afghanistan have ranged from $800 million to $1.5 billion annually in recent years. Indian investments in Afghanistan span various sectors, including infrastructure, telecommunications, and agriculture. A strained political relationship may jeopardize these investments and hinder further economic cooperation.

India primarily imports dried fruits, nuts, spices, and carpets from Afghanistan. There's also a significant import of medicinal herbs and precious stones. India’s exports to Afghanistan include petroleum products, machinery and equipment, pharmaceuticals, vehicles, iron and steel, textiles, and agricultural products. These export items may vary in terms of volume and value depending on various factors such as trade agreements, economic conditions, and political relations between India and its neighbouring countries.

India has been involved in several infrastructure projects in Afghanistan, such as the construction of roads, dams, and power plants. For instance, India constructed the Zaranj-Delaram highway, which connects Afghanistan with Iran's Chabahar port, providing a crucial alternative route for trade.

These projects not only contribute to Afghanistan's development but also serve India's strategic interests by enhancing connectivity to Central Asia and beyond. Any disruptions due to political tensions could stall these projects, affecting economic growth prospects for both countries.

Political instability in Afghanistan can have spill-over effects on the entire South Asian region, including India. Heightened security threats can disrupt trade routes, discourage foreign investment, and increase the cost of doing business. Investors may perceive the region as risky, leading to a reduction in capital inflows and economic activity.

Afghanistan is strategically located and holds potential as a transit route for energy resources from Central Asia to South Asia. Projects like the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline aim to capitalize on this potential. However, political instability and insecurity in Afghanistan could delay or impede the development of such energy projects, impacting India's energy security and economic growth prospects.

India has provided significant humanitarian assistance and development aid to Afghanistan, including scholarships for Afghan students and support for capacity-building programs. Strained political relations may hinder India's ability to continue these efforts, which could have long-term repercussions on human development indicators and socio-economic stability in Afghanistan.

In conclusion, maintaining a stable and cooperative relationship with Afghanistan is crucial for fostering mutual prosperity and ensuring long-term economic benefits for both countries.

Challenges and the Road Ahead

Despite the progress, some challenges persist. Complex regulations and occasional border tensions can act as deterrents. The government is continuously working to address these issues by further streamlining regulations, fostering better communication with neighbouring countries, and promoting people-to-people exchanges.By strengthening regional ties and improving the business environment, India is well-positioned to leverage its strategic location and tap into the economic potential of the broader South Asian and Southeast Asian regions.

Conclusion

India's neighbourly relations present both challenges and opportunities for its economic development. By prioritizing diplomatic engagement, trade liberalization, infrastructure development, confidence-building measures, and economic diversification, India can overcome obstacles and forge stronger ties with its neighbours. In doing so, it can unlock new avenues for growth, foster regional stability, and emerge as a key player in the global economy.

Government of India may fully exploit commercial opportunities in neighbouring countries through its focus on enhancing trade relations through strategic partnerships and infrastructure development.

India can invest in infrastructure projects in neighbouring countries to facilitate smoother trade flows. India's investment in the development of the Chabahar Port in Iran is a good example. This port provides India with access to Afghanistan and Central Asia, bypassing Pakistan.

India can negotiate bilateral and multilateral trade agreements with neighbouring countries to lower tariffs and trade barriers. For example, the South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA) can be strengthened to promote greater economic integration within the South Asian region.

The Indian government can provide incentives and support to Indian businesses looking to export to neighbouring countries. This can include trade missions, market research, and financial assistance. For instance, India can promote its pharmaceutical industry by exporting generic drugs to countries like Nepal and Bangladesh, which have growing healthcare needs.

Promoting cultural exchange programs can help foster stronger ties with neighbouring countries, leading to increased business opportunities. For example, India can organize cultural festivals and exhibitions to showcase its diverse heritage and attract tourists from neighbouring countries.

India can encourage Indian companies to invest in neighbouring countries, particularly in sectors where India has a competitive advantage. For instance, Indian companies can invest in the renewable energy sector in countries like Bhutan and Nepal, which have abundant hydropower resources.

India can offer technology transfer and capacity-building support to neighbouring countries to help them develop key industries. For example, India can collaborate with Bangladesh in the textile industry to improve production efficiency and quality.

By implementing these strategies, India can favourably exploit the commercial opportunities that exist in neighbouring countries and strengthen its economic ties with the region.


**********Disclaimer: The information and statistics presented in this article have been compiled from various sources deemed reliable. However, readers are advised to independently verify the accuracy and relevance of the data before making any decisions or taking action based on the information provided herein. The author and publisher do not assume any responsibility or liability or any consequences resulting from reliance on the information presented in this article.

2024/08/17

No comments:

Post a Comment