Regional Inequalities: Challenge for Economic Growth

Author : CA A. K. Jain


-Chapter Headings-

* Preamble
1. Regional Disparities in GDP :

2. Infrastructure Divide :
a) Highly Developed States :
b) Moderately Developed States :
c) Developing States :
d) Underdeveloped States :
e) Special Category States :
3. Human Development Index (HDI) :

4. Employment Opportunities :
a) Maharashtra :
b) Karnataka :
c) Tamil Nadu :
d) Telangana :
e) Gujarat :
f) Delhi :
g) Uttar Pradesh :
h) Kerala :
i) West Bengal :
j) Rajasthan :

5. Government Expenditure Disparity :
6. Regional Disparities in Agricultural Productivity :

* Inequalities Obstructing Economic Development
1. Regional Inequalities in India Affecting Economic Productivity :
a) Income Disparities :
b) Educational Inequality :
c) Healthcare and Life Expectancy :
d) Infrastructure and Industrial Development :
e) Agricultural Productivity :

2. Social Unrest from Inequalities Impacts Economic Productivity
a) Movements for Statehood and Autonomy :
b) Ethnic and Communal Tensions :
c) Maoist Insurgency :
d) Farmers’ Protests :
e) Inter-State Water Disputes :
3. Brain Drain in India Due to Regional Inequalities :

* Strategies for Reducing Inequalities
1. Enhancing Infrastructure and Connectivity :
2. Focused Investment in Education and Skill Development :
3. Encouraging Decentralization and Local Governance :
4. Inclusive Economic Policies :
5. Encouraging Regional Cooperation :
6. Digital Infrastructure :
7. Health and Social Welfare Improvements :

* Government Action Plan
1. Finance Commission :
2. Backward Regions Grant Fund (BRGF) :
3. Special Category Status :
4. Financial Assistance :
5. Regional Development Institutions :
6. Tax Incentives and Subsidies :

* Conclusion

Preamble

Regional inequalities in India refer to the uneven distribution of resources, infrastructure, and economic opportunities across different states and regions. These disparities hinder the nation's overall economic development by creating imbalances in growth, social welfare, and employment. These imbalances constrain India’s overall economic progress, reducing the efficiency of resource allocation, limiting market expansion, and fostering migration pressures, all of which slow down sustainable development. To address these challenges, India needs to implement policies that promote balanced regional development. This includes investments in infrastructure, education, and healthcare in less developed regions, as well as measures to attract investment and create employment opportunities. Additionally, policies aimed at reducing poverty and inequality can help bridge the gap between developed and less developed regions. Here are some facts, figures, and examples to illustrate this.

1. Regional Disparities in GDP : There's a substantial gap in GDP per capita between different states in India. The per capita income varies significantly across states. States like Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu have much higher per capita incomes compared to states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and Odisha.


LIST OF INDIAN STATES AND UNION TERRITORIES BY GSDP (2021–22)
State/Union Territory GSDP (Rs. millions)
Maharashtra 31,080,218.70
Tamil Nadu  20,712,861.60
Gujarat 19,770,664.60
Uttar Pradesh 19,745,315.50
Karnataka 19,627,254.20
West Bengal 13,639,258.60
Rajasthan 12,181,934.50
Madhya Pradesh 11,361,371.90
Andhra Pradesh 11,338,365.00
Telangana 11,289,072.40
Kerala 9,324,699.60
Delhi 9,046,420.40
Haryana 8,706,645.30
Odisha 6,708,812.30
Bihar 6,503,024.30
Punjab 6,142,267.60
Assam 4,126,118.70
Chhattisgarh 4,064,158.20
Jharkhand 3,588,625.90
Uttarakhand 2,721,594.80
Jammu and Kashmir 1,999,174.20
Himachal Pradesh 1,762,694.70
Goa 826,037.00
Tripura 625,504.40
Chandigarh 456,352.60
Puducherry 442,378.60
Meghalaya 387,847.00
Sikkim 375,574.00
Manipur 365,944.70
Arunachal Pradesh 351,235.40
Nagaland 319,125.40
Mizoram 278,235.00
Andaman and Nicobar Islands 103,705.20

2. Infrastructure Divide : Infrastructure development across Indian states varies significantly, with some states leading in certain sectors while others lag behind. Here's a broad classification of Indian states based on their infrastructure development:

a) Highly Developed States : Maharashtra: With cities like Mumbai and Pune, Maharashtra leads in infrastructure development, especially in transportation, urban infrastructure, and industrial infrastructure. Gujarat is known for its industrial development, Gujarat has robust infrastructure in ports, roads, and power generation. Tamil Nadu is strong in manufacturing and services, Tamil Nadu boasts good transportation infrastructure, including ports and airports. Karnataka has well-developed urban infrastructure and IT infrastructure. Delhi as the national capital region, has significant infrastructure development, including transportation, utilities, and healthcare facilities.

b) Moderately Developed States : Kerala is known for its high human development index. Kerala has good social infrastructure, including healthcare and education, but transportation infrastructure needs improvement. Punjab has decent road infrastructure and industrial development, particularly in agriculture-related sectors. Telangana with Hyderabad as its capital, has seen significant growth in IT infrastructure, though there's room for improvement in other sectors. Rajasthan has made strides in improving infrastructure, particularly in tourism-related sectors and transportation.

c) Developing States : Uttar Pradesh with a large population, faces challenges in infrastructure development, but efforts are being made to improve roads, power, and urban infrastructure. Bihar lags behind in infrastructure development, particularly in roads, power, and healthcare. Odisha is rich in natural resources. Odisha is focusing on infrastructure development, especially in ports, power, and transportation. In West Bengal, Kolkata serves as the primary hub, but infrastructure development in other parts of the state needs attention. Assam is working on improving connectivity and industrial infrastructure, but there's a long way to go.

d) Underdeveloped States : Jharkhand despite its mineral wealth, Jharkhand faces challenges in infrastructure development, especially in transportation and power. Chhattisgarh is similar to Jharkhand. Chhattisgarh has abundant natural resources but lacks robust infrastructure. While Uttarakhand has potential in tourism, infrastructure development, especially in remote areas, is a challenge. Himachal Pradesh due to its hilly terrain, struggles with infrastructure development, particularly in remote areas.

e) Special Category States : North Eastern States (Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura, Sikkim ) receive special attention from the central government for infrastructure development due to their geographical remoteness and unique challenges.

This classification is generalized and based on overall infrastructure development. Each state may excel in specific sectors while facing challenges in others. Additionally, infrastructure development is an ongoing process, and states may transition between categories over time.

3. Human Development Index (HDI) : There's a noticeable difference in human development indicators across states. States like Kerala and Goa consistently rank higher on the HDI due to better access to healthcare, education, and overall living standards compared to states like Bihar and Uttar Pradesh.

State Wise High Human Development Index
Rank State/Union Territory HDI (2021)
1 Kerala 0.752
2 Goa 0.751
3 Chandigarh 0.744
4 Delhi 0.73
5 Puducherry 0.726
6 Lakshadweep 0.715
7 Himachal Pradesh 0.703
8 Sikkim 0.702
9 Jammu and Kashmir 0.699
10 Punjab 0.694
11 Haryana 0.691
12 Maharashtra 0.688
13 Mizoram 0.688
14 Tamil Nadu 0.686
15 Manipur 0.678
16 Uttarakhand 0.672
17 Nagaland 0.67
18 Karnataka 0.667
19 Arunachal Pradesh 0.665
20 Daman and Diu 0.661
21 Telangana 0.647
22 Meghalaya 0.643
23 Rajasthan 0.638
24 Gujarat 0.638
25 Andhra Pradesh 0.63
26 Tripura 0.629
27 West Bengal 0.624
28 Dadra and Nagar Haveli 0.62
29 Chhattisgarh 0.605
30 Assam 0.597
31 Odisha 0.597
32 Madhya Pradesh 0.596
33 Uttar Pradesh 0.592
34 Jharkhand 0.589
35 Bihar 0.571
36 India (average) 0.633

4. Employment Opportunities : Economic activities and job opportunities are concentrated in certain regions, leading to large-scale migration from poorer states to more prosperous ones. For instance, people from states like Bihar and Uttar Pradesh often migrate to cities like Delhi, Mumbai, and Bangalore in search of better employment opportunities, exacerbating the regional divide. General overview of employment trends in India by state is placed below.

a) Maharashtra : Maharashtra, particularly Mumbai and Pune, has been a hub for employment opportunities, especially in sectors like IT, finance, manufacturing, and entertainment.

b) Karnataka : With Bangalore (Bengaluru) as its capital, Karnataka is a major IT and technology hub. The state also has opportunities in sectors like biotechnology, aerospace, and manufacturing.

c) Tamil Nadu : Tamil Nadu, with Chennai as its capital, has a strong manufacturing base, especially in the automobile and electronics sectors. Chennai is also a hub for IT and software services.

d) Telangana : Hyderabad, the capital of Telangana, is another major IT hub in India, attracting companies from around the world. The state also has opportunities in pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and manufacturing.

e) Gujarat : Gujarat has a diverse economy with opportunities in manufacturing, petrochemicals, textiles, and agriculture. Cities like Ahmedabad and Surat are prominent industrial centres.

f) Delhi : Delhi, being the capital territory, offers employment opportunities in various sectors, including government services, IT, finance, education, and healthcare.

g) Uttar Pradesh : Uttar Pradesh has opportunities in agriculture, manufacturing, and service sectors. Cities like Noida and Ghaziabad also have emerging IT and manufacturing industries.

h) Kerala : Kerala's economy is driven by sectors like tourism, IT, healthcare, and remittances from its large expatriate population.

i) West Bengal : West Bengal has opportunities in manufacturing, agriculture, and services. Kolkata, the capital, has a mix of industries including IT, finance, and education.

j) Rajasthan : Rajasthan has opportunities in tourism, agriculture, handicrafts, and mining. Cities like Jaipur and Udaipur also have growing IT and services sectors.

These are just some highlights, and the employment scenario can vary within each state based on local factors, government policies, and global economic trends. For the most accurate and up-to-date information, it's best to refer to recent reports and studies from credible sources like government agencies and industry associations.

Unemployment Rate By States And Union Territory
(As of September 2022)
State or Union Territory Unemployment Rate (%)
Andhra Pradesh 4.8
Arunachal Pradesh 18.3
Assam 0.4
Bihar 11.4
Chhattisgarh 0.1
Delhi 9.6
Goa 10.9
Gujarat 1.6
Haryana 22.9
Himachal Pradesh 9.2
Jammu and Kashmir 23.2
Jharkhand 12.2
Karnataka 3.8
Kerala 4.4
Madhya Pradesh 0.9
Maharashtra 4
Meghalaya 2.3
Mizoram NA
Nagaland NA
Odisha 5.9
Puducherry 7.3
Punjab 7
Rajasthan 23.8
Sikkim NA
Tamil Nadu 4.1
Telangana 8.3
Tripura 17
Uttar Pradesh 4
Uttarakhand 0.5
West Bengal 3.3

5. Government Expenditure Disparity : There's also a significant difference in government expenditure across states, both in terms of absolute spending and allocation efficiency. States with stronger economies often generate more revenue and can allocate more funds for infrastructure, education, and healthcare compared to poorer states, perpetuating the cycle of inequality.

Budgeted Outlay For Financial Year 2023-24

Andhra Pradesh

Rs. 279,279 Crore

Arunachal Pradesh

Rs. 29,657 Crore
Assam Rs. 321,000 Crore
Bihar Rs. 261,885 Crore
Chhattisgarh Rs. 121,500 Crore
Delhi Rs. 78,800 Crore
Goa Rs. 26,844 Crore
Gujarat Rs. 301,000 Crore

Haryana

Rs. 183,950 Crore
Himachal Pradesh Rs. 53,413 Crore
Jammu and Kashmir Rs. 118,500 Crore
Jharkhand

Rs. 116,418 Crore

Karnataka Rs. 327,747 Crore
Kerala Rs. 312,000 Crore
Madhya Pradesh Rs. 314,024 Crore
Maharashtra Rs. 547,450 Crore
Manipur Rs. 35,022 Crore
Meghalaya Rs. 22,022 Crore
Mizoram

Rs. 14,209 Crore

Nagaland Rs. 23,086 Crore
Odisha Rs. 230,000 Crore
Punjab Rs. 196,462 Crore
Rajasthan Rs. 297,091 Crore
Sikkim

Rs. 12,146 Crore

Tamil Nadu

Rs. 360,379 Crore

Telangana

Rs. 290,396 Crore

Tripura

Rs. 26,892 Crore

Uttarakhand

Rs. 77,407 Crore

Uttar Pradesh

Rs. 690,242 Crore

West Bengal

Rs. 339,162 Crore

6. Regional Disparities in Agricultural Productivity : Agricultural productivity varies widely across states due to differences in soil fertility, water availability, and infrastructure. States like Punjab and Haryana have highly productive agricultural sectors, while states like Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh face challenges in increasing agricultural output due to factors like inadequate irrigation facilities and fragmented land holdings.

Addressing these regional disparities requires a comprehensive approach involving targeted investments in infrastructure, education, healthcare, and agriculture in economically disadvantaged regions. It also necessitates policy interventions aimed at promoting inclusive growth, fostering entrepreneurship, and creating employment opportunities across all states to ensure equitable development and reduce the gap between regions.

Inequalities Obstructing Economic Development

The persistence of regional inequalities throw-up multifaceted challenges to India's economic development :
1. Regional Inequalities in India Affecting Economic Productivity : India is characterized by stark regional inequalities that significantly affect its economic productivity. These disparities manifest in various dimensions, including per capita income, poverty rates, educational attainment, health services, and infrastructure. These regional imbalances not only hinder overall economic growth but also exacerbate social tensions and limit the equitable distribution of development benefits.

a) Income Disparities : The economic productivity of different states in India varies significantly. States like Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, and Gujarat have much higher per capita income than states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and Jharkhand. This disparity results in unequal economic opportunities and living standards.

b) Educational Inequality : Education is a critical determinant of economic productivity. States with higher literacy rates and better educational facilities have a more skilled workforce, leading to higher productivity levels. Kerala, with the highest literacy rate, has a more skilled workforce compared to Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, leading to higher levels of human capital and economic productivity.

c) Healthcare and Life Expectancy : Healthcare facilities and life expectancy are crucial for maintaining a productive workforce. Regional inequalities in healthcare infrastructure lead to disparities in health outcomes, directly affecting labour productivity. Kerala has a high life expectancy and low infant mortality rate due to better healthcare infrastructure, contributing to a healthier and more productive workforce compared to states like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.

d) Infrastructure and Industrial Development : States with better infrastructure and industrial bases attract more investments and provide a conducive environment for economic activities, leading to higher productivity. Maharashtra and Gujarat, with higher road density and electricity availability, have developed industrial sectors contributing to their economic output, unlike Bihar, which suffers from infrastructural deficiencies.

e) Agricultural Productivity : Agricultural productivity also varies significantly across regions, affecting the livelihoods of a large proportion of the population, especially in rural areas. Punjab and Haryana have higher agricultural productivity due to better irrigation and farming techniques, while Bihar and Rajasthan lag due to lower irrigation coverage and less productive agricultural practices.

These regional disparities in income, education, healthcare, infrastructure, and agricultural productivity reflect the uneven economic development across India. Addressing these inequalities is crucial for enhancing overall economic productivity, fostering inclusive growth, and reducing socio-economic disparities. Effective policy interventions focusing on balanced regional development, infrastructure investment, and improved social services can help bridge these regional divides.

2. Social Unrest from Inequalities Impacts Economic Productivity : Regional inequalities in India have led to significant social unrest, manifesting in various forms such as protests, movements for statehood, inter-state conflicts, and even insurgencies. This social unrest not only disrupts the socio-political fabric of the nation but also hampers economic productivity by affecting investment, labour markets, and overall growth prospects.

a) Movements for Statehood and Autonomy : Movements for statehood and demands for greater autonomy often arise from regional imbalances. People in regions with lower development levels demand separate states or special status to ensure a fair share of resources and economic opportunities. The Telangana movement led to prolonged social unrest, affecting the economic stability of Andhra Pradesh due to frequent strikes and shutdowns, deterring investment and industrial activity until the state was officially bifurcated in 2014.

b) Ethnic and Communal Tensions : Regional disparities often exacerbate ethnic and communal tensions, leading to conflicts that disrupt social harmony and economic activities. The ethnic conflicts in Assam have led to the displacement of populations, disruption of economic activities, and a decline in sectors like tea production, which is crucial to the state's economy.

c) Maoist Insurgency : Maoist or Naxalite insurgency is a significant form of social unrest rooted in regional inequalities, especially in the mineral-rich yet underdeveloped regions of Central and Eastern India. In Chhattisgarh, frequent attacks by Maoist insurgents have led to disruptions in mining operations, affecting the state's contribution to India's mineral production and scaring away potential investments.

d) Farmers’ Protests : Farmers' protests often stem from regional inequalities, particularly in agrarian states where economic policies are perceived as favouring more industrialized regions. The farmers' protests in Punjab and Haryana against the new farm laws in 2020-2021 led to a disruption in supply chains and transport routes, directly impacting agricultural productivity and the economic output of these states.

e) Inter-State Water Disputes : Inter-state water disputes are a major source of regional tension, affecting agricultural productivity, industrial use, and even the daily water supply for citizens. The Cauvery water dispute has led to frequent protests and violence in both Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, with agricultural productivity in the region being directly affected due to uncertainty over water availability.

Social Unrest and Economic Impact
Cause of Unrest Regions Affected Direct Economic Impact
Statehood Movements Telangana, Gorkhaland, Vidarbha Disruption of economic activities, strikes
Ethnic and Communal Tensions Assam, Gujarat, Northeast Loss of productivity, damage to infrastructure
Maoist Insurgency Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha Reduced mining/industrial activity, infrastructure damage
Farmers’ Protests Punjab, Haryana, Maharashtra Disruption of supply chains, loss in agricultural productivity
Inter-State Water Disputes Karnataka-Tamil Nadu, Punjab-Haryana Agricultural losses, industrial slowdowns

Regional inequalities in India have led to significant social unrest, which in turn hampers economic productivity. Movements for statehood, ethnic tensions, insurgencies, farmers' protests, and water disputes all highlight the need for balanced regional development and equitable distribution of resources. Addressing these disparities through targeted policies and inclusive development strategies is crucial to minimizing social unrest and enhancing the nation's economic productivity.

3. Brain Drain in India Due to Regional Inequalities : India has long grappled with regional inequalities that result in a significant brain drain from underdeveloped regions to more developed urban centres. This phenomenon impacts economic productivity as skilled individuals migrate in search of better opportunities, leaving less developed regions with limited human capital to drive growth.

States like Maharashtra, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Delhi have experienced rapid industrial and economic growth. In contrast, states like Bihar, Jharkhand, Odisha, and Uttar Pradesh lag behind due to factors like poor infrastructure, low industrial investment, and inadequate education and healthcare facilities. A large number of skilled professionals, including engineers, doctors, IT professionals, and academics, migrate from less developed states to urban centres like Bangalore, Hyderabad, Pune, and Mumbai.

Students from states with poor educational infrastructure migrate to cities with reputed educational institutions. Upon graduation, many choose to stay in these cities for better job prospects. The exodus of skilled labour from underdeveloped regions leads to a reduced talent pool, hampering economic productivity and development in these areas. Conversely, cities experiencing an influx of talent face challenges like overpopulation and infrastructure strain. Some examples:

a) Bihar : Despite producing a significant number of IAS and IIT graduates, Bihar suffers from a severe brain drain. A large number of its students migrate to cities like Delhi, Pune, and Bangalore for higher education and job opportunities due to the lack of quality educational institutions and limited job prospects within the state.

b) Uttar Pradesh : The state has a high rate of out-migration, especially among skilled workers. Cities like Noida and Ghaziabad, which are part of the National Capital Region (NCR), absorb a large number of migrants from within the state seeking better employment. However, this migration results in a talent deficit in other parts of Uttar Pradesh.

c) Odisha : While Odisha has rich natural resources, it lags in industrial development and higher education infrastructure. As a result, there is significant migration of educated youth to states like Karnataka and Maharashtra for IT and engineering jobs.

Strategies for Reducing Inequalities

Addressing regional inequalities in India requires a multi-faceted approach, considering the diverse socioeconomic conditions across states. Here are several suggestions supported by data and examples:

1. Enhancing Infrastructure and Connectivity : Improve physical infrastructure, including roads, railways, and digital connectivity, in less developed regions. Road Connectivity as of 2022, the National Highway density is uneven across states. For instance, Uttar Pradesh has a density of 2.2 km per 100 sq. km, while the national average is 1.24 km per 100 sq. km . Enhancing connectivity in states below the national average, like Bihar and Odisha, can stimulate economic activities. Improved infrastructure not only enhances productivity but also attracts investment and facilitates economic activities.

2. Focused Investment in Education and Skill Development : Invest in quality education and skill development programs tailored to the needs of each region. Empowering the workforce with relevant skills enhances employability and fosters local entrepreneurship. Prioritize educational facilities and vocational training in lagging regions to boost human capital. States like Bihar (61.8%) and Arunachal Pradesh (65.4%) have much lower literacy rates compared to Kerala (94%). Increasing educational investment in low-literacy states can bridge this gap. Skill Development: Programs like Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) should focus more on states with higher unemployment rates, such as Jharkhand (17.3%) and Bihar (11.9%) in 2022.

3. Encouraging Decentralization and Local Governance : Empower local governments through increased funding and autonomy to address region-specific issues effectively. Greater financial devolution and autonomy for Panchayats in states like Jharkhand and Odisha can lead to more tailored and effective local development projects. Strengthening grassroots institutions can enhance accountability and responsiveness to local needs.

4. Inclusive Economic Policies : Formulate policies that promote inclusive growth and address the specific challenges faced by marginalized regions and communities. Targeted interventions in sectors such as agriculture, rural development, and small-scale industries can uplift disadvantaged regions. Encourage industries in less developed states through incentives and support. States like Maharashtra and Gujarat attract the highest industrial investments, whereas states like Bihar and Jharkhand attract significantly less . Introducing tax incentives and easing regulatory processes for industries in backward regions can encourage balanced industrial growth. Invest in agricultural technology, irrigation, and rural development programs to boost the rural economy. Punjab and Haryana have high agricultural productivity, while states like Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh lag behind. Implementing advanced farming techniques and improving irrigation facilities in these states can enhance productivity. Expanding programs like MGNREGA in underdeveloped states can provide immediate employment and infrastructure development in rural areas.

5. Encouraging Regional Cooperation : Foster collaboration among states and regions to leverage complementary strengths, share best practices, and promote balanced regional development. Initiatives such as interstate infrastructure projects and regional trade agreements can foster economic integration and shared prosperity.

6. Digital Infrastructure : Internet penetration is 45% in rural areas compared to 71% in urban areas as of 2021. The Bharat Net project aims to connect 250,000 Gram Panchayats, but its progress needs acceleration.

7. Health and Social Welfare Improvements : Improve healthcare infrastructure and social welfare schemes in poorer regions. According to the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5, 2019-20), states like Bihar and Uttar Pradesh have poor health indicators, including high infant mortality rates (IMR) of 46 and 38 per 1,000 live births, respectively . Increasing the number of healthcare centres and improving their quality can reduce these disparities.

Addressing regional inequalities in India requires a strategic approach involving infrastructure development, education, industrialization, agriculture enhancement, healthcare improvement, and local governance empowerment. These efforts should be data-driven and tailored to the specific needs of each region to ensure balanced and inclusive growth across the country.

Government Action Plan

Regional inequality is a complex issue in India, but the government has undertaken several initiatives to address it. Here's a breakdown of some key efforts, along with facts and figures:

1. Finance Commission : The Finance Commission of India, established under Article 280 of the Indian Constitution, is a crucial institution for fiscal federalism in India. Since its inception in 1951, the Finance Commission has been responsible for recommending the distribution of tax revenues between the central government and the states. One of its primary objectives is to address regional inequalities by ensuring an equitable distribution of resources. The 14th Finance Commission (2015-2020) increased weightage to "Income Distance" for allocation, aiming to bridge the gap between richer and poorer states. This resulted in a significant rise in transfers to underdeveloped regions.

The Finance Commission aims to balance the disparities among states by adopting various criteria, such as population, income, fiscal capacity, and fiscal effort, to recommend a fair distribution of resources. The "Income Distance " concept refers to the financial gap between economically developed and underdeveloped regions. It encompasses the challenges faced by less developed regions due to factors like geographical location, lack of infrastructure, and insufficient investment in human capital. Some examples:

a) Bihar : Despite being one of the most populous states, Bihar has historically been one of the poorest in terms of per capita income. The 15th Finance Commission recommended increased devolution to Bihar to enhance infrastructure and public services. The state received a higher share of central taxes (10.06%) to address its developmental gaps.

b) Odisha : Known for its mineral wealth, Odisha has struggled with poverty and regional inequalities. The Finance Commission has provided special grants to improve healthcare and education in the state. Efforts to enhance industrial development have been a focus, with specific grants aimed at boosting the state's industrial base.

c) Tamil Nadu : A relatively developed state with a high level of industrialization and infrastructure. While it receives a lower share of devolution compared to underdeveloped states, the Finance Commission has emphasized grants for modernization and advanced healthcare facilities.

The Finance Commission plays a pivotal role in addressing regional inequalities in India. By recommending the distribution of resources with an emphasis on states' needs and developmental gaps, the Commission seeks to mitigate the " Income Distance" While progress has been made in reducing disparities, challenges persist, necessitating continuous efforts to ensure balanced regional development and enhanced economic productivity across the nation.

2. Backward Regions Grant Fund (BRGF) : The Backward Regions Grant Fund (BRGF) was launched by the Indian government in 2006 to address regional disparities and promote inclusive growth in underdeveloped areas. The BRGF aimed to catalyze development in 272 identified backward districts across 27 states. The program sought to improve infrastructure, enhance governance, and support socio-economic development, thereby contributing to the overall economic productivity of the nation.

BRGF Implementation
Parameter Details/Statistics Examples
Infrastructure Development Construction of 1.5 lakh km of rural roads Roads in Jharkhand and Odisha improved connectivity.
Poverty Reduction Reduction in poverty by 5-10% in BRGF districts Reduction in poverty observed in districts of Bihar and Chhattisgarh.
Employment Generation Creation of 3 million jobs through BRGF projects Skill development programs in Madhya Pradesh led to increased employment.
Water Supply and Sanitation 60,000 villages provided with clean drinking water Clean drinking water projects in Rajasthan and West Bengal improved health outcomes.
Educational Infrastructure Construction of 30,000 new classrooms New schools and classrooms in Uttar Pradesh and Assam.
Capacity Building Initiatives Training of 50,000 local government officials Training programs in Karnataka improved local governance.
Percentage of Fund Utilization Approximately 80% in many regions High fund utilization in states like Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu.
Challenges Identified Inefficient fund use in some areas (approx. 20%) Poor fund utilization in districts of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.

The Backward Regions Grant Fund played a significant role in reducing regional inequalities and promoting inclusive growth in India. By targeting the development of backward regions, BRGF contributed to enhancing the economic productivity of the nation. Although the program faced challenges such as inefficient fund utilization and coordination issues, its overall impact in improving infrastructure, reducing poverty, and building local capacity was substantial. Addressing the identified challenges can further enhance the effectiveness of such initiatives, ensuring more balanced regional development across India.

3. Special Category Status and Special Economic Zones : The government has designated certain states as "Special Category States" based on criteria like hilly and difficult terrain, low population density, strategic location along international borders, economic and infrastructural backwardness and non-viable nature of state finances. These states receive special attention and assistance from the central government.

North Eastern Region Development Ministry (NERDM) established in 2001, this ministry focuses on infrastructure development, promotion of industries, and social development in the North-Eastern states, a region with historical development lags. States like Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, Tripura, and Uttarakhand have been granted Special Category Status. Additionally, Special Economic Zones have been established in various parts of the country to attract investment, boost exports, generate employment, and bridge regional disparities.

4. Pradhan Mantri Khanij Kshetra Kalyan Yojana : Launched in 2015, the Pradhan Mantri Khanij Kshetra Kalyan Yojana (PMKKKY) is an initiative by the Government of India aimed at mitigating the adverse impacts of mining activities on people and the environment in mining-affected areas. Launched in September 2015, PMKKKY aims to reduce regional inequalities by utilizing a portion of the funds collected under the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) for the development and welfare of affected regions and populations. This scheme focuses on improving living conditions, healthcare, education, and economic productivity in mining regions that often face the brunt of environmental degradation, health hazards, and socio-economic challenges.

Impact of PMKKKY in Different Regions

State/Region Funds Collected under DMF (in INR Crore) Key Initiatives Impact Economic Productivity
Odisha 12,000+ Healthcare, Education, Infrastructure Construction of 500+ schools, improved healthcare in mining areas Enhanced literacy rates, reduction in health-related productivity loss
Chhattisgarh 6,000+ Infrastructure, Health, Livelihoods Over 1,000 km of roads constructed, improved healthcare access Improved connectivity, leading to increased economic activity
Jharkhand 5,000+ Skill Development, Health, Education Vocational training for 10,000+ youth, new hospitals constructed Higher employability, improved human capital
Madhya Pradesh 4,500+ Water Supply, Education, Healthcare Installation of 200+ water supply units, mobile health units Better health outcomes, reduced loss of workdays
Karnataka 3,000+ Infrastructure, Environment, Skill Training Reforestation of mining areas, skill training for 5,000 youth Environmental conservation, increased local employment
Rajasthan 2,500+ Education, Healthcare, Infrastructure Construction of 300+ schools, mobile health vans for remote areas Improved education and health leading to increased productivity
Maharashtra 2,000+ Livelihood, Infrastructure, Health Livelihood programs for 20,000+ households, healthcare camps Improved livelihoods, increased rural economic activity
Goa 1,500+ Environment, Education, Health Environment restoration projects, health camps in mining regions Improved environmental sustainability, healthier workforce

PMKKKY has been instrumental in reducing regional inequalities caused by mining activities by channelling DMF funds toward the holistic development of affected regions. By focusing on healthcare, education, infrastructure, and skill development, the scheme has contributed to improving the socio-economic conditions of mining-affected areas, thereby boosting economic productivity. However, continuous monitoring and effective implementation are crucial to ensuring sustained benefits and narrowing regional disparities.

5. Financial Assistance : Various schemes and programs have been launched to provide direct financial assistance and promote development in marginalized regions. Examples include the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which guarantees 100 days of wage employment to rural households, thereby reducing poverty and enhancing rural incomes. Additionally, programs like the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) focus on connecting rural areas with all-weather roads, and improving access to markets, healthcare, and educational facilities.

6. Regional Development Institutions : The government has established regional development institutions like the North Eastern Development Finance Corporation to provide financial assistance, technical support, and entrepreneurship development in the north eastern states. Similarly, institutions like the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) offer credit and other financial services to rural areas, facilitating agricultural and rural development.

7. Tax Incentives and Subsidies: To attract investment and industrial development in backward regions, the government offers tax incentives and subsidies. For example, under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, certain states are eligible for concessions to promote investment and industrial growth. All the North-Eastern states along with Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Jammu & Kashmir are considered special category states. These states are eligible for a concessional GST rates . Several other states also offer their own set of concessions under GST. Some examples include: Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu. It's important to note that the specific concessions and eligibility criteria vary depending on the state government's policies.

Conclusion

Regional inequality poses a formidable challenge to India's quest for sustained economic growth and social development. Tackling this complex issue requires a concerted effort from policymakers, civil society, and the private sector. By addressing the root causes of regional disparities and implementing targeted interventions, India can unlock the full potential of all its regions, fostering inclusive and sustainable development for the benefit of all its citizens. Only through inclusive growth can India truly emerge as a beacon of progress and prosperity on the global stage. The government's focus on infrastructure development through initiatives like Sagarmala (port development) and Bharatmala (highways) can improve connectivity and potentially boost economic activity in lagging regions. Skill development programs targeted at specific regions can improve employability and income levels. Effective implementation and addressing issues like corruption are crucial for the schemes to achieve their goals.

 

 

**********Disclaimer: The information and statistics presented in this article have been compiled from various sources deemed reliable. However, readers are advised to independently verify the accuracy and relevance of the data before making any decisions or taking action based on the information provided herein. The author and publisher do not assume any responsibility or liability for any consequences resulting from reliance on the information presented in this article.

2024/09/19

No comments:

Post a Comment