BHARAT……..”The
Development Dilemma”
( India Challenge Series - 3 )
Population Pressure:
Frustrating Economic Growth
https://youtu.be/ToPL3lK9Xbc
https://youtu.be/mTavrh4bacQ
India’s population, now
exceeding 1.4 billion, presents both opportunities and challenges for
economic development. On one hand, a large and youthful workforce offers
the potential for a demographic dividend. On the other, unchecked
population growth places immense stress on resources, infrastructure,
public services, and the environment, undermining sustainable growth. This
article reviews the impacts, government responses, challenges, and
possible solutions to India’s population pressure.
Impact and Consequences
1. Unemployment
A surplus labour force, coupled with limited job creation, results in high
unemployment and underemployment. Many individuals remain trapped in
low-productivity, informal jobs, reducing innovation and slowing overall
productivity growth.
2. Strained
Infrastructure
Urbanization has led to overcrowded cities, slums, inadequate housing,
congested transport, and stressed sanitation systems. Poor infrastructure
reduces investment, disrupts markets, and lowers quality of life.
3. Pressure on Natural
Resources
Overuse of land, water, and forests threatens sustainability.
Agriculture suffers from land fragmentation and water scarcity, while
environmental degradation reduces long-term economic prospects.
4. Healthcare and
Education Stress
A vast population stretches healthcare and education systems.
Hospitals face shortages of staff and resources, while schools struggle
with overcrowding and uneven quality. These constraints weaken human
capital formation and productivity.
Government Efforts
1. Family Planning
Programs
India was the first country to adopt a family planning program in 1952.
The approach evolved from coercive sterilization in the 1970s to a
rights-based, target-free model post-1990s. Integration with maternal and
child health services and widespread contraceptive promotion reduced the
Total Fertility Rate (TFR) from 5.9 in the 1950s to 2.0 by 2019-20. Yet,
disparities persist: states like Bihar (3.2) and Uttar Pradesh (2.7) still
record high fertility.
2. Mission Parivar
Vikas (2016)
Focused on 146 high-fertility districts across seven states, this program
improved contraceptive access and awareness. Districts such as Kishanganj
in Bihar (TFR ~4.8-4.9) highlight the challenge of regional imbalances
caused by socio-economic and cultural factors.
3. National Population
Policy (2000)
The NPP aimed to achieve replacement-level fertility (TFR 2.1) by 2010 and
stabilize population by 2045. Progress has been mixed:
• Achievements:
IMR reduced to 28, MMR to 97, and institutional deliveries rose to over
85%.
• Shortfalls: Fertility targets were missed in high-birth states;
contraceptive use (54% in 2019) lagged behind the 65% goal. Persistent son
preference, early marriages, and weak rural infrastructure slowed
outcomes.
4. Incentives and
Awareness Programs
Monetary incentives for sterilization, rewards for healthcare workers,
subsidized contraceptives, media campaigns, school-based education, and
legal measures (two-child norms, higher marriage age) were introduced.
Successes included higher contraceptive awareness and declining IMR.
Failures stemmed from poor rural outreach, low male participation, and
ethical issues around coercion.
5. Healthcare
Infrastructure
The National Health Mission (NHM), Pradhan Mantri Surakshit Matritva
Abhiyan, and Ayushman Bharat expanded maternal and child healthcare
access. Population Research Centres provided data-driven insights. Still,
rural shortages of personnel, poor quality services, and cultural
resistance limit effectiveness.
6. Education Expansion
Education-especially for girls-has proven to reduce fertility. India’s GER
in elementary education rose to 97.2% by 2019-20, and higher female
literacy correlates with smaller family sizes. Yet, dropout rates and
uneven quality remain concerns.
Successes in Population Management
• TFR: Declined
from 5.9 (1950s) to 2.0 (2020), near replacement level.
• Contraceptive Use: Increased from 10% (1950s) to 56% (2021).
• IMR: Dropped from 145 (1950s) to 28 (2021).
• MMR: Fell significantly due to maternal health schemes.
• Institutional Deliveries: Improved drastically, especially in
rural areas.
Weaknesses and Challenges
1. Target-Free
Approach: While empowering, it reduced accountability and diluted
program focus.
2. Limited Outreach: High-fertility districts remain underserved,
particularly in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh.
3. Gender Disparity: Women often lack decision-making power in
family planning.
4. Weak Implementation: Programs suffer from poor monitoring,
inadequate funding, and rural neglect.
5. Social & Cultural Barriers: Son preference, early marriage, and
misconceptions about contraception remain strong.
6. Overemphasis on Female Sterilization: This limited choice,
created gender imbalance in responsibility, and sometimes led to coercion.
International Comparison: China’s One-Child Policy
China’s one-child policy
(1979) slowed population growth drastically, reducing fertility from 6 to
below 2.1 and growth rates to 0.5%. It also spurred urbanization and
empowered women, but caused gender imbalance and an aging population.
While effective in controlling numbers, the coercive model created social
distortions-offering lessons for India on avoiding overly restrictive
measures.
Recommendations
1. Prioritize
High-Fertility Districts
Programs like Mission Parivar Vikas must be better funded, locally
tailored, and community-driven to address regional disparities.
2. Improve Service
Delivery
Strengthen rural healthcare infrastructure, diversify contraceptive
options, and ensure consistent supply chains.
3. Focus on Education
and Women’s Empowerment
Expand girls’ education, enforce delayed marriage, and improve
reproductive health awareness among youth and men.
4. Reform Incentives
Introduce non-coercive incentives for small families, link benefits to
socio-economic criteria (not caste/religion), and phase out blanket
subsidies that encourage unproductive population growth.
5. Promote Sustainable
Development
Adopt eco-friendly policies, better urban planning, and renewable energy
to reduce environmental strain from population pressure.
6. Strengthen
Governance
Enhance program monitoring, accountability, and grassroots implementation
through trained ASHA workers, local NGOs, and digital platforms.
Conclusion
India’s demographic
profile holds both risks and rewards. The country has achieved significant
progress in reducing fertility, infant mortality, and improving maternal
health, but challenges remain in high-fertility states due to
socio-cultural resistance, weak infrastructure, and gender inequality.
Population stabilization
must be treated as a national priority, integrated with education,
healthcare, women’s empowerment, and sustainable development strategies.
With renewed focus, data-driven policy, and community engagement, India
can transform its demographic pressure into a demographic dividend,
ensuring inclusive and sustainable economic growth.
----------------------------------------------------
About The Article
This article is the extract of one of the chapter of the best-selling book on
Indian Macro-Economics, titled.... Bharat........” The Development Dilemma"
authored by CA Anil Kumar Jain.
“This book is a must-read for
every aware and enlightened citizen. It presents an in-depth analysis of the
challenges faced by an emerging India and offers innovative suggestions and
practical solutions to overcome them, paving the way for our nation to attain
the esteemed position of Vishwaguru in the near future.”
The book is available at
Amazon, Flipkart, Google Play Books and Ahimsa Foundation (WhatsApp Your Request -
9810046108).
|
No comments:
Post a Comment