PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH
COURT - CIT VS M/S K. C. PIPES PVT. LTD.
ITA NO.386 OF 2010
2ND AUGUST, 2016
ITA NO.386 OF 2010
2ND AUGUST, 2016
Core Fact of the Case : …….The appeal is against the order of the Tribunal
pertaining to the Assessment Year 2006-07. The Tribunal confirmed the order of
the CIT (Appeals). The respondent-assessee filed its return of income. During
the course of assessment, the Assessing Officer noticed that the paid up share
capital of the assessee during the year in question had increased by 80 lacs on
account of 15 share holders having subscribed to the shares. The Assessing
Officer came to the conclusion that these 15 applicants were farmers. It is
contended before us that the farmers are not aware of the functioning of the
share market. It was contended that the source of the money paid by the farmers
is doubtful……..the share holders had appeared before the Assessing Officer. The
only grievance is that they had not appeared again. The matter pertains to
questions of fact and the Tribunal and the CIT (Appeals) have found that the
money, in fact, was received by the Company. In consideration thereof, shares
were issued and amount has been credited to the appropriate account. If the
share holders have acquired the money illegally, the respondent assessee cannot
be held liable. There is nothing to show that the money belongs to the Company/assessee
itself. The revenue must then proceed against the share holders.
Summarised Judgment: …………….The appeal is, therefore, dismissed as no substantial question of law arises. We do not make any observation regarding the assessment proceedings in respect of the 15 parties who had subscribed to the shares.
Analysis: This judicial pronouncements states that, there is nothing to show that the money belongs to the Company/ assessee itself. The revenue must then proceed against the share holders. In the case of JSM also there is no evidence to say that, the money belongs to assessee.
Summarised Judgment: …………….The appeal is, therefore, dismissed as no substantial question of law arises. We do not make any observation regarding the assessment proceedings in respect of the 15 parties who had subscribed to the shares.
Analysis: This judicial pronouncements states that, there is nothing to show that the money belongs to the Company/ assessee itself. The revenue must then proceed against the share holders. In the case of JSM also there is no evidence to say that, the money belongs to assessee.
No comments:
Post a Comment