NEW GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY TO INVESTIGATE
FINANCIAL FRAUDS
BY CA A. K. JAIN
Introduction
Taking clue from
the developed nations Indian Government has also established a
multi-disciplinary organization under Ministry of Corporate Affairs to
investigate serious financial frauds committed in India. This office known as
“SFIO” is working with the help of experts in the filed of accountancy,
forensic science, auditing, law, information technology, investigation, company
law, capital market and taxation. SFIO is extensively being used by the
government for detecting and prosecuting white-collar crimes / frauds. The SFIO
investigation is generally undertaken in the circumstances where public
interest is involved or the fraud has multi-disciplinary ramifications.
Serious Fraud Offices Abroad
United Kingdom
The Serious
Fraud Office is an arm of the Government of the United Kingdom, accountable to
the Attorney General. Established by the Criminal Justice Act 1987, the Serious
Fraud Office is responsible for the investigation and prosecution of suspected
cases of serious or complex fraud where 1 million Pounds or more are involved
or covers more than one national jurisdiction, though it is rare for cases
involving less than 1 million to be taken. It has jurisdiction over England and
Wales and Northern Ireland but not Scotland, the Isle of Man or the Channel
Islands, though the Serious Fraud Office's compulsory information powers
contained in section 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1987 do so under invitation
from the relevant prosecuting body. The vast majority of fraud in the United
Kingdom remains the responsibility of police forces. The SFO is not a police
force and its members have no direct personal executive powers, such as the
power of arrest. Each case is dealt with by a case team made up of various
professionals such as lawyers, forensic accountants and police officers
seconded from police forces. The police officers remain members of their
relevant police force for the duration of their secondment and it is they who
would arrest if the investigation.
New Zealand
The New Zealand
Serious Fraud Office is based upon the British model. The SFO works closely
with the New Zealand Police in trying to prevent serious and complex fraud.
Established by the Serious Fraud Office Act 1990, the Serious Fraud Office is
responsible for the investigation and prosecution of suspected cases of serious
or complex fraud. Suspects questioned by the SFO have no right to silence and
must answer questions and produce requested evidence, even if it incriminates
them. Anyone who refuses to comply can be jailed.The New Zealand Government
announced in September 2007 that the SFO would be replaced by a new Organised
Crime Agency. However, the bill to disband the SFO was delayed by the inquiry
into donations received by the political party New Zealand First.
Structure
The Government
approved setting up of this organization on 9th January 2003 on the basis of
the recommendations made by the Naresh Chandra Committee which was set up by
the government to study corporate governance. The Charter of SFIO was issued by
the Government on 21st August 2003. Serious Fraud Investigation Office started
functioning from 1st October 2003. This organization was set up in the backdrop
of stock market scams, failure of non financial banking companies, phenomena of
vanishing companies and plantation companies etc. This is a new organization
and does not have separate statute to govern it for the present and in the
interim period the investigations are being carried out under the provisions of
Companies Act 1956. SFIO takes up investigation of the cases of alleged frauds
referred to it by the Central Government under section 235 / 237 of the
Companies Act 1956.
Companies Act
The Central
Government is empowered under the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 235
of the Companies Act, 1956 to appoint one or more competent persons as
Inspectors to investigate the affairs of a company and to report thereon in
such manner as the Central Government may direct where a report has been made
by the Registrar under sub-section (6) of section 234.
Similarly, the
Central Government under the provisions of section 237 of the Companies Act
1956 shall appoint one or more competent persons as Inspectors to investigate
the affairs of the company if -
(a) The company,
by special resolution or the Court, by order declares that the affairs of the
company ought to be investigated.
(b) In the
opinion of the Company Law Board there are circumstances suggesting that,
(i) That the
business of the company is being conducted with intend to defraud its
creditors, members or any other persons or otherwise for a fraudulent or
unlawful purpose, or in a manner oppressive of any of its members, or that the
company was formed for any fraudulent or unlawful purpose.
(ii) That
persons concerned in the formation of the company or the management of its
affairs have in connection therewith been guilty of fraud, misfeasance or other
misconduct towards the company or towards any of its members.
(iii) That the
members of the company have not been given all the information with respect to
its affairs which they might reasonably expect, including information relating
to the calculation of the commission payable to a managing or other director or
the manager, of the company.
The Powers - The
powers of the Inspector for carrying out the investigation, as listed in
section 239, 240 and 240 (A) of the Companies Act are as follows:-
The appointed
inspectors may investigate the following entities and may use other avenues of
investigation mentioned herein below:
(a) Any other
body corporate which is, or has at any relevant time been the company’s
subsidiary or the holding company, or a subsidiary of its holding company, or a
holding company of its subsidiary;
(b) Any other
body corporate which is, or has at any relevant time been managed by any person
as managing director or as manager, who is, or was at the relevant time, the
managing director or the manager of the company;
(c) Any other
body corporate which is, or has at any relevant time been, managed by the company
or whose board of directors comprises of nominees of the company or, is
accustomed to act in accordance with the directions or instructions of the
company, or any of the director of the company, or any company, any of whose
directorships is held by the employees or nominees of those having; the control
and management of the first mentioned company;
(d) Any person
who is or has at any relevant time been the company’s managing director or
manager, the Inspector shall subject to the prior approval of the Central
Government have power so to do and shall report on the affairs of the other
body corporate or of the managing director or manager, so far as he thinks that
the results of his investigation thereof are relevant to the investigation of
the affairs of the first mentioned company.
(e) To call all
officers and other employees and agents of the company to preserve and produce
before him or any person authorized by him in this behalf with the previous
approval of the Central Government, all books and papers of, or relating to,
the company or, as the case may be, or of relating to the other body corporate
which are in their custody or power.
(f) With the
prior approval of the Central Government may require any body corporate other
than a body corporate first one to furnish such information to, or produce such
books and papers before him or any persons authorized by him in this behalf
(with the previous approval of the Government) as he may consider necessary if
the furnishing of such information or production of such books and papers is
relevant or necessary for the purposes of his investigation.
(g) Under the
provisions of section 240A of the Act where the Inspector has reasonable ground
to believe that the books and papers of, or relating to any company or other
body corporate or managing director or manager of such company or body
corporate may be destroyed, mutilated, altered, falsified or secreted, he may
make an application to the Magistrate of the First Class or, as the case may
be, the Presidency Magistrate, having jurisdiction for an order for the seizure
of such books and papers.
The Procedure
As the
investigations are carried out under the provisions of the Companies Act, the
Officer appointed as Investigating Officer by the Government has the final say
in the matter related to investigation. The working groups of the officers
constituted by the Director, SFIO in consultation with the I O, to assist the
Investigating Officer are required to render him all possible assistance in the
respective areas of their specialization so that the issues are examined from a
multidisciplinary angle. He supervises the entire investigation and coordinates
with subject specific team leaders in the matters related thereto. The
Investigating Officer, after conclusion of his investigation, submits the
Investigation Report to the Central Government in the Ministry of Corporate
Affairs.
Administration
For smooth
functioning of the administration of the SFIO office, the Director has been
declared ‘Head of the Department’. He exercises the powers of HOD. He is
assisted in this task by one of the Additional Directors who has been given the
charge of Administration. Under him there is an administration unit headed by a
Deputy Director who is assisted by two Assistants.
Time Frame
For each
investigation that is to be carried out by the officers of this organization,
the Central Government while ordering the same assigns a time frame. The
investigation has to be completed within that time frame. The subject specific
groups of officers which render necessary assistance to the Investigating
Officer have to examine the issues involved in the case within a given time
frame and give requisite inputs to the Investigating Officer.
Recommended Prosecutions
As per the
information available, SFIO after their investigation has recommended
prosecution the following companies.
Daewoo Motors
India Ltd., Design Auto Systems Ltd., Bonanza Biotech Ltd., Vatsa Corporation
Ltd., Mardia Chemicals Ltd., Soundcraft Industries Ltd., Kolar Biotech Ltd.,
Adam Comsof Ltd., DSQ Software Ltd., Usha India Ltd., Malvika Steels Ltd.,
Koshika Telecom Ltd., Chitrakoot Computers, Classic Credit Ltd., Classic Shares
& Stock Broking Services Ltd., Goldifsh Computer Pvt. Ltd., KNP
Securities Pvt. Ltd, Luminant Investrade Pvt. Ltd, Manmandir Estate Dev., N. H.
Securities Ltd., Panther Fincap and Management Services Ltd., Panther
Industrial Products Ltd., Panther Investrade Ltd., Saimangal Investrade Ltd.,
Triumph International Finance India Ltd., V. N. Parekh Securities Pvt. Ltd.,
Triumph Securities Pvt. Ltd., Nakshatra Software Pvt. Ltd., Morepen Laboratories
Ltd., Shonk Tech. Ltd., Shonk Tech. Int. Ltd.
SFIO Addresses - The addresses of SFIO offices
are as follows:
Delhi Office - Serious Fraud Investigation
Office, Ministry of Company Affairs, 2nd Floor, ‘B’ Wing, Paryaveran Bhawan,
CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi, India.
Mumbai Office - Everest Building, 6th Floor, 100
Marine Drive, N.S Marg, Mumbai.
Tapuriah Jain & Associates
Chartered Accountants
21,. Skipper House, 9, Pusa Road, New Delhi - 110 005
Tele : 91-11-28754012 & 13, Mobile : 91-98-100-46108, E-Mail : caindia@hotmail.com
Chartered Accountants
21,. Skipper House, 9, Pusa Road, New Delhi - 110 005
Tele : 91-11-28754012 & 13, Mobile : 91-98-100-46108, E-Mail : caindia@hotmail.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment